Thu, May 2, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 6, Issue 1 (4-2024)
Int. J. Ethics Soc 2024, 6(1): 60-68 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sheikhahmadi K, Yamani Doozi Sorkhabi M, Pardakhti M H P, Ferasatkhah M. Ethical Pattern of Faculty Members in Iran's Higher Education. Int. J. Ethics Soc 2024; 6 (1) : 7
URL: http://ijethics.com/article-1-283-en.html
URL: http://ijethics.com/article-1-283-en.html
Kazhal Sheikhahmadi * 
1, Mohammad Yamani Doozi Sorkhabi2 , Mohammad Hassan Pardakhti Pardakhti2 , Maghsoud Ferasatkhah3
1, Mohammad Yamani Doozi Sorkhabi2 , Mohammad Hassan Pardakhti Pardakhti2 , Maghsoud Ferasatkhah3
1- Department of Higher Education Management, University of Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Iran , kazhalshikhahmadi@yahoo.com
2- Department of Higher Education Management, University of Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Higher Education Management, Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Higher Education Management, University of Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Higher Education Management, Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (38 Views)
Introduction: Academic faculty members need to emphasize ethical principles in order to improve higher education, with the understanding of this importance, the current research was conducted with the aim of designing the ethical model of academic faculty members in Iran's higher education.
Material & Methods: This research is a type of qualitative study that uses foundational data theory. The participants, including experts and faculty members of the country's public universities, who were responsible for the promotion of academic members, were selected as key informants through a targeted sampling method of 45 people. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The reliability and validity of the data were obtained from the two methods of reviewing the participants and recoding by experts. Data were analyzed by open, central and selective coding.
Results: The results showed that the moral model of faculty members in Iran's higher education is explained in 10 main categories and 27 subcategories. Major and core categories in the form of 6 dimensions of causal conditions including (individual factors, organizational factors), core (cultural-educational, educational ethics, research ethics, scientific-executive), background conditions (higher education policies, moral activism), intervening conditions (environmental factors), strategies (micro level - university, macro level - higher education) and consequences (individual and organizational) were elevated to a higher abstract level and finally the research paradigm model was presented.
Conclusion: The regulations for the promotion of academic staff members in Iran require a detailed revision of the content with an ethical and qualitative approach in order to make the indicators of the promotion regulations efficient and effective.
Material & Methods: This research is a type of qualitative study that uses foundational data theory. The participants, including experts and faculty members of the country's public universities, who were responsible for the promotion of academic members, were selected as key informants through a targeted sampling method of 45 people. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The reliability and validity of the data were obtained from the two methods of reviewing the participants and recoding by experts. Data were analyzed by open, central and selective coding.
Results: The results showed that the moral model of faculty members in Iran's higher education is explained in 10 main categories and 27 subcategories. Major and core categories in the form of 6 dimensions of causal conditions including (individual factors, organizational factors), core (cultural-educational, educational ethics, research ethics, scientific-executive), background conditions (higher education policies, moral activism), intervening conditions (environmental factors), strategies (micro level - university, macro level - higher education) and consequences (individual and organizational) were elevated to a higher abstract level and finally the research paradigm model was presented.
Conclusion: The regulations for the promotion of academic staff members in Iran require a detailed revision of the content with an ethical and qualitative approach in order to make the indicators of the promotion regulations efficient and effective.
Article number: 7
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2023/07/10 | Accepted: 2023/09/11 | Published: 2024/04/26
Received: 2023/07/10 | Accepted: 2023/09/11 | Published: 2024/04/26
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
© 2024 CC BY 4.0 | International Journal of Ethics and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb